How Many Books Should You Read Each Year?
In America’s culture of “more is probably better”, people tend to flaunt how many books they’ve read like badges of honor that offer implied evidence of competence. In this context, Pew Research says that Americans read an average of 12 books per year. The median is four books per year. But is there really a number of books you “should” or need to read to succeed?
Introduction is not application
Reading has the power to introduce you to all kinds of information and ways of thinking. In that sense, the concept that lifelong learning through literature, articles, or other documents improves with quantity makes sense. After all, you can’t learn something if you never expose yourself to it.
But the fallacy in this way of thinking is that it assumes that a person actually will apply what they have learned through the books. This is not necessarily true. Some people read and understand an enormous amount. Yet, they don’t act or make new decisions based on what they’ve acquired. In these situations, they arguably aren’t much better off than if they hadn’t read the texts at all. The reading doesn’t yield change or growth. I much rather would read just a handful of carefully selected books that prove to be largely influential in what I do than spend weeks or months with what doesn’t inspire or direct me.
Time and resources vary
Not everyone has the same amount of time or resources that allow them to read. Many people work multiple jobs to make ends meet. They often don’t have as many free hours. Their free minutes might go to connecting with family instead of reading. They also might be so tired that it’s hard to really mentally process what’s on the page. Other individuals might have time but lack the quick, reliable access to as many physical or digital books. This is not uncommon if they are in a rural or underprivileged community. It’s unfair to compare reading levels when some people are in circumstances that naturally make reading more of a challenge.
Unfinished still counts
We’ve probably all been in the situation where a book isn’t quite as engaging as we’d hoped. It’s also common that a book doesn’t give us the answers we’d anticipated. Continuing with these texts arguably is a bad idea, because it takes time from books that would engage and inform. Strategically choosing to stop and move on to something better can be quite rational. Yet, we generally don’t acknowledge the time we spend reading books we eventually drop. Failing to acknowledge those books skews the perception of how much we’re reading in total.
Word counts are all over the place
There’s a similar problem in book lengths. Although it’s true that most genres have a “typical” word count, the range for content is enormous. For example, most publishers consider novel length to be between 50,000 and 110,000 words. But one of my favorite texts, the English Penguin Classics translation of Les Miserables, weighs in with a whopping 364,000. So that book is like reading three, yet you only get one title to brag about on your “finished” list.
When push comes to shove, the basic rule of thumb is just to read as much as you can given your situation at rate that allows you to make use of what you learn. There’s little value in tracking how much you read by title and comparing yourself.